MISS MOOX: movie

  • Spending

    Spending
    Spending

    There's no doubt that our culture is a consumer culture. With the wide variety of goods available, and greater amount of money to spend at leisure and on non-necessities, young singles like me with greater stretch in their spending power particularly tend to drop a lot of cash.

    It surprises me how often my, and our, activities revolve around purchasing. Get bored: spend an hour or so at the mall, and end up buying some item of clothing you neither need nor really want. Go out with friends: drinks or a meal plus tip and you've just spent times what you would if you made it at home. A movie will cost you 6 bucks minimum, and that latte you crave, more than four dollars for twenty minutes' caffeinated pleasure. See an ad, and you're subtly but powerfully convinced, especially as you think about it, that you have a new "need" you never realized before.

    Marketing, and our culture, focuses on creating a want and then compelling you to spend your money to satisfy that want. Whether it's a specified product or just a general attempt to fill some psychological need with the latest techy toy or newest shoes, we always seem to feel we need more.

    Of course, I would say it's more than simply cultural: it's a product of human nature. "The lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life", as an older translation of the Bible puts it, is still alive.

    I've been thinking about this a lot lately, as a spending freeze forced on me by current joblessness and the expenses of Christmas has kept me from spending anything but the bare minimum. It's made me realize how much I carelessly drop a few dollars here, several dollars there: and how many of my daily activities revolve around money. I tend to spend as much as I have. That is to say, if I have money in the bank I don't see any problem with a mocha latte, or a gratuitous trip to Goodwill to find some funky vintage clothing; but the truth is that I have no savings account and many of my purchases are impulsive, ill-thought-out, and completely unecessary.

    Much of the time I feel vaguely guilty when I spend, but can often rationally justify it. It wasn't really that much, I do deserve a few pleasures, I'm generous to others, and so on. But in reality, when the rubber meets the road and I'm jobless and penniless, were any of those purchases greater value than a fuller bank account now would be? Did they demonstrate foresight, or simply living for the moment?

    I don't have any real answer; I'm rambling, simply because it's a problem I'm facing and I'm not sure of the answer. It can't be simply an ascetic avoidance of all purchases and a fanatical counting of every penny; but at the same time, I recognize a need for more discipline and restraint than I've hitherto exercised. What the answer will be, I'm not sure. I'm as much in need of grace with this as with anything.

  • Outdoors

    A few months ago, I spent a week living with a family who kindly offered to take me in when my then-residence was overrun by relatives, necessitating appropriation of every available sleeping space. So for a week I inhabited the second family's basement guest room.

    Living with anyone is an interesting and educational experience: you quickly get an honest and intimate portrait of who they are as people that is simply not possible any other way. It is rawer, realer, and sometimes drastically different than their social face. In their accustomed habitat, it is impossible for people to hide themselves. Everything from eating habits to leisure time to handling conflict is an open book to those with whom you share living quarters.

    This can be a good or a bad thing. The revelations range from the trivial (they eat a lot of sugary cereal) to the shocking (she's been viewing online dating profiles even though she has a boyfriend). Sometimes they can verge on the unbearable (she keeps using my things, leaving the window open in the freezing cold, and bossing me around about everything I do).

    Having lived or stayed with many different people, for differing periods of time, over the past several years, I've had plenty of up-front opportunity to avail myself of this education in humanity.

    But I digress.

    One of the things that surprised me the most about this family I stayed with was the leisure-time habits of their three young boys. Ranging in age from five to eleven, they came home from school every afternoon and promptly flopped down in front of the TV. Flicking it on, they lost themselves in rapt contemplation of kids' programs, movies, or video games until bedtime. Even things like eating or doing homework seemed to be viewed as interruptions to tube time: they'd reluctantly get up, quickly do the task assigned, and released, flop back down in front of the TV. Nearly every waking moment not taken up by absolutely necessary functions was devoted to the television. I don't mean they did nothing else with their leisure time: but their attention almost inevitably gravitated toward the TV at any given opportunity, like some kind of invisible but invincible pull of natural law. Even though the weather was nice, I never saw them play outside.

    I suppose the reason I was surprised was that it was so different from how my brothers and I grew up. One of the quirky policies of my family that I am thankful for (amid the many I am not), was the banning of television from our home. Even though it was done for reasons I would not necessarily agree with now, I am deeply grateful that it was because I'm convinced it contributed to our intellectual and physical development.

    Deprived of mindless entertainment, we were forced to turn to other occupations. Every waking moment not taken up by school was spent outdoors when the weather was fine. Joining up with our neighbourhood friends, we organized ourselves into teams to play the sport of the moment (football, baseball, basketball, dodgeball, road hockey, 4-square, obstacle courses, hide-and-seek, or one of many others depending on our mood). Our choice aligned itself with whatever big-league play was on at the time or simply our latest fad. Apart from sports, we often constructed imaginary play scenarios and acted them out together, or built legoes and created elaborate storylines for them.

    Even bad weather was no hindrance. On rainy days, we'd gather inside to play board games or just to talk. Winter presented us with unique possibilities: snow-fort construction, always striving for the biggest and the strongest. Snowball wars, divided up into teams and with rules about permitted materials (ice not included) and body zones to avoid (head shots didn't count). "Sledding" down the meager mounds we built from the snow shoveled off the driveway. When we couldn't feel our toes and fingers anymore, we'd collect inside to drink hot chocolate and play Monopoly.

    Darkness didn't stop us. On those endless summer nights of fireflies and seductive warmth we amused ourselves with a much trickier variant of hide-and-seek called "flashlight tag". The person who was "it" wielded the flashlight, and anyone caught in its beam was out. This necessitated much more inventive hiding and commando-like sneaking through the brush. Strategies included black clothing and face paint for camouflage.

    Sometimes, we'd just sit outside and look up at the stars and wonder at the universe.

    The nearby creek represented endless discovery. Despite the shallowness in summer, we waded into the deepest part to "swim", carefully avoiding the multitudinous crayfish and their tiny but vicious pinches. We constructed dams out of rocks and congratulated ourselves on the deepness of the pools that resulted. We caught crayfish, utilizing the most accurate method (carefully and slowly sneak a net or container down behind them, then scare them from the front, making them shoot backwards). We netted small fish: once I kept a stickleback for several months, until it slowly nibbled away at a tadpole I added for company. We went fishing, despite the fact that our most impressive catches rarely registered over six inches. We waded across and explored the woods on the other side, using a downed tree as a "fort". Once three of our most adventurous friends constructed a raft and floated down the creek into the pond, nearly capsizing themselves in the process and having to be rescued.

    We spent entire days hiking through the forest and swinging from the ponderous hairy vines that hung from the trees in a way that would have credited any tropical forest. We climbed trees: one in our yard was so perfect and climbed so frequently that I could swing up it as smoothly and as quickly as a monkey. One of my favorite spots to read was perched on the low branch of another tree. The giant willow with its two tire swings amused us endlessly until it came crashing down in an ill-fated windstorm.

    There were also more solitary pursuits. I was an inveterate collector and our yard represented collector's paradise. We theorized that it must have been a colonial dump due to the number of glass bottles, porcelain pieces, doll parts, and rusted iron implements we dug up. Once I found an African coin complete with a full-masted clipper on one side and a hole through the top (sadly lost long ago). I had a lovely collection of intact glass soft drinks bottles, including Pepsi and the famous Coke bottle. Ours was also an area rich in fossils, and my entire room turned into a display of my prized collection. Finally, fed up with dirt and stray rock bits, my mother made me move the impromptu museum into the basement: a transgression I have only recently forgiven her for since they all disappeared.

    Because we were solely responsible for coming up with our own entertainment, we were nearly unlimited in our inventiveness. My two younger brothers and I had to be forcibly pried away from spending every spare moment with our friends and outdoors. When we were (our parents were of the opinion that too much time with them wasn't good for us), we mourned. Nobody had to put us into a summer program, or convince us that physical activity was a good thing. We were lean and strong as whips and happily self-motivated. We got messy and dirty and cut and bruised and gloriously tired out. And we enjoyed it.

    When I look back, this part of my childhood seems like paradise: the writer's dream of a long, lazy, free existence owned by a gang of kids who roam at will.

    In a typical memory, it is summer. The sun has come up through the tree outside my window with the promise of another blazing-hot, perfect day. We will gather together with Casey, Mike, Dave, and if necessary, our wider circle of friends, and we'll plan what to do for the day. We'll pick teams, and go. All day long, until we are reluctantly called home for supper, we will play. We'll make plans to gather up again after supper. And we'll play again until our curfew cuts us off and we have to troop home, with assurances that we'll do it all again tomorrow.

    I never thought I was old enough for this kind of nostalgia. But when I compare our healthy lifestyle with the children who spend most of their time in front of a computer or a TV, I feel very lucky indeed. We were fierce and wild and untameable, but mostly innocent, and we had lots of fun. Thanks to my parents, for one choice well made.

  • Let It Snow!

    Let It Snow!

    Greetings on this WINTRY WHITE DAY!
    The snow is falling gently on this December morning.
    This Christmas I pray each one of you are blessed to spend time with family and friends to celebrate the season.
    Christmas services...
    Caroling
    Exchanging gifts...
    Dining together...
    Helping the needy...
    Celebrating Jesus birth.

    Several years ago I made this little Christmas quilt. I added hand embroidered touches, buttons, tiny charms, soft flannel, festive homespun prints and a cheerful Christmas theme.

    "Every time a bell rings an angel gets it's wings..."
    from "It's A Wonderful Life"
    One of my favorite Christmas movies

    "Mother in the kitchen now
    baking pies and cakes,
    cookies, candies, goodies, too.
    That only Mother makes."

    Can you smell the sweet aroma from Mother's pies and cakes?
    I enjoyed hand embroidering the steam escaping from each pie!

    I love embroidering french knots! They make the prettiest snowflakes.

    Baby...It's cold outside!

    The winter weather has arrived in style.
    We have a beautiful coat of white puffy snow
    blanketing the landscape.
    It's definitely mitten weather!

    "Over the hill and through the woods...
    to Grandmother's house we go..."

    "WINTRY WHITE STUFF"
    Having a little fun with picmonkey...
    Would you believe it's snowing inside???

    Merry Christmas! This year my husband is home. I am so grateful and never take it for granted. I recall the year that he was deployed overseas. Please remember those who are serving away from home this Christmas. May God bless them and their families. Blessings,Carolynn xoxo

    "Joy to the world
    the Lord has come...
    Let earth receive her King!"

    This Christmas I know many of you will be remembering the families who have suffered
    tremendous loss. May God give them comfort.



    I'm linking to all my favorite blog parties and giveaways for this coming week.
    I hope you will stop by and visit with each lov ely blog.


    Thank you, Meri, for sharing so many of your sweet vintage images.
    They all speak of a simpler time.
    www.imagimeris.blogspot.com

  • The Nativity Story

    Yesterday I went to see The Nativity Story. Overall, I thought it was well done, and I'd give it about 3-1/2 out of 5 stars.

    The film had a very authentic feel to it, from the costumes to the set to the background activities taking place. It "felt" like a fairly accurate portrait of Judea two millenia ago. Apparently extensive research went into making it as authentic as possible, and it paid off, really enhancing the experience of the movie. Some of the filmography was incredibly beautiful, particularly the shots of Mary and Joseph travelling by the Sea of Galilee or the Wise Men trekking through the desert.

    Quite a lot of "extraneous" material was added to "pad out" the story to the proportions necessary for a feature film. The "adding" was generally tastefully done, with nothing that detracted from the story (with possibly one or two exceptions, which I'll cover later on).

    The filmmakers did a good job casting actors from a variety of ethnic backgrounds who all managed to look suitably dark-haired and dark-skinned Middle Eastern. The accented English they employed was designed to mimic the effect of speaking Aramaic, and while this could have been distracting, managed to be rather effective (as compared to Mel Gibson's subtitles in The Passion).

    The film really focusses on the human element of the story. We tend to dwell on the miraculous (at least I do) and pass over the fact that this happened to real people in real time with real situations and real emotions. Some things it brought home to me: the brutal Roman oppression of the Israelites; their longing for the Messiah; the relationship between Mary and Joseph; the shame they must have suffered when Mary was found to be pregnant outside of wedlock and Joseph chose to marry her anyway. The cruelty of Herod was well-portrayed and emphasized the fact that the "opposition" was trying to destroy the Son of God from his very birth.

    The most touching moments of the film (for me) were the portrayal of Jesus' actual birth, and the shepherds coming to kneel before the manger. I have to confess that I cried. The fact of God entering human time and space through a teenager's body and the bloody, painful, raw experience of actual birth was astounding. He really became one of us in every way. As the shepherds knelt, I experienced a moment of awe. Their worship of someone who was nothing more than a newborn baby is astounding evidence, to me, that God revealed to them who he was.

    Despite the realism, some elements seem slightly out of place. One scene in particular seemed a little forced: Mary and Joseph are fording a stream, with Mary on their donkey. As they cross, a snake swims by. The donkey spooks and Mary is swept off and barely saved by Joseph. Perhaps, a la The Passion where Jesus stomps on the head of a snake, this is meant to depict the battle between the snake and the offspring of the woman foretold in Genesis 3:15, but it seemed rather out of place.

    Some bits of the film are rather anachronistic and/or a result of the "editing" necessary to make a coherent whole. For example, the wise men show up at the stable, rather than about two years later as most scholars believe. As they and their camels kneel on the right, and the shepherds and their lambs kneel on the left of the rock cave stable, the star shines down onto the baby and the camera pans out to show us the classic Nativity scene of modern portrayals. I rather wish the film had gone for a bit more authenticity at this point and challenged our cliched conceptions rather than confirming them.

    Other essential elements of the story were missed out: Mary's joyful song of worship, known as the Magnificat; the multitude of angels serenading the shepherds when the birth was announced.

    As for the acting, I was disappointed in the portrayal of Mary. As the film begins, she is a slightly sullen, rebellious, typically modern teenager who clashes a bit with her parents. As it progresses, she gradually and gracefully accepts her role, but I never got the impression that it was with the wholeheartedness and joy that the Bible portrays. The Mary of the Magnificat was clearly a mature, faithful, humble and robust believer who considered it the highest possible honour to be the mother of the Messiah, as any Jewish woman of her age would. The Mary of the film is accepting, but it almost seems like something that is thrust upon her and she has to learn to deal with rather than something she is fully cooperative with. Perhaps that is the effect the filmmakers were aiming for—and it certainly enhances the "human" element—but I believe that a look at the nativity story of the Bible would show us something far different.

    In addition, Keisha Castle-Hughes' acting was somewhat wooden and unemotional; I never felt like I got to "know" Mary as a person. She was silent and stoic; again, perhaps that was the effect aimed for, but I was disappointed.

    In contrast, the portrayal of Joseph (Oscar Isaac) was excellent. He came across as a warm, well-rounded, emotionally integrated man who fully interacted with his unusual circumstances. In addition, he was good, honest, faithful, fair, hard-working, self-sacrificing and merciful; genuinely loved Mary and was fully prepared to take her son as his own. By the end of the film, I wanted to marry him myself! Joseph definitely shone as the star of this story.

    In conclusion: this film focuses our attention on an often-neglected part of Jesus' story and is a valuable and entertaining visual. Go and see it, but make sure to read Luke 1-2 when you're finished to get the original story.

  • Homespun Christmas

    Homespun Christmas

    Greetings to all my wonderful blogging friends and family!
    I've been having so much fun adding festive Christmas touches to my home.
    I hope you'll come join me in the celebration!

    Sleigh bells ring...
    Are you listening?

    Each Christmas my little red sleigh sits happily in my kitchen.
    I love adding homespun items in hopes of filling it to the brim.
    Evergreens,
    Small pillows,
    quilted stuffies,
    wooden toys,
    patriotic touches,
    pretty red and green ribbons
    and a chubby quilted Santa...
    They all make the season so bright and colorful.

    "Gather Round the Christmas Tree"
    Do you see my shy little kitty, Abigail?
    She waited to come down and investigate until after I had left the room.

    When I decorate, my kitty, Zoey is always right in the middle of things.
    She gets so excited with all the activity and always finds a spot to claim as her very own.

    I love Teddy Bears!
    Over the years my family and friends have given me each one of these little darlings.
    Can you tell I love all things patriotic?
    I was a Navy wife for many years and always find myself favoring the colors red, white and blue.

    My mischievous Zoey is always looking for places to hide.
    When I discovered her she startled me!
    This adorable scene reminds me of one from the movie "E.T."
    "E.T...Phone Home!"

    Thank you for stopping by and sharing this wonderful season with me. Around the world people are celebrating this glorious time of year. I pray that you have a blessed Christmas as you celebrate The Birthday of a King Messiah Lord Savior Redeemer

    Blessings and A Merry Christmas! Carolynn xoxo "Behold, the virgin shall be with child,and bear a Son, andthey shall call His nameImmanuel,which is translatedGod with us."Matthew 1:23

    Oh, My Goodness! Have you seen Meri's giveaway? It's absolutely wonderful.If you would like to be included in her drawing you will want to pop inand say hello!www.imagimeris.blogspot.com

    I'm linking to all my favorite blog parties and giveaways this coming week.I hope you will stop by my side bar and visit with each lovely blog.

  • Invisible Children

    Last night, I watched a heartbreaking documentary called "Invisible Children". This movie was filmed by three American college students who went to Africa in 2003 intending to document refugees in the Sudan. Instead, they ended up in northern Uganda, where they heard about an even more alarming situation. For 20 years, a civil war has raged there between the rebels of the "Lord's Resistance Army", led by a demonically-inspired man called Joseph Kony, and the government. This army's purpose is purportedly to fight the government and help the Acholi people. Instead, it terrorizes them. Tens of thousands of children (no one is exactly sure how many) between the ages of eight and fourteen have been forcibly abducted, often by other children, and spirited away into the bush by Kony and his rebels. There they are made to participate in senseless brutality so evil it would make you weep to hear it described. Children are tortured and killed violently if they cannot keep up, or if they are suspected of rebellion, or simply at whim. Children are made to kill other children, and told they themselves will be killed if they refuse to participate. Girls are made into sex slaves for lieutenants and commanders, and often come back from the bush, if they escape at all, with one or more children and sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS.

    Some of the children manage to escape. But if and when they do, they are scarred for life. Their drawings are all of soldiers, death, bloodshed. They have missed much or all of their education and their childhood is gone. They live in fear of being hunted down and killed or re-recruited by the rebel army. Many of them are permanently crippled or maimed. Many of the girls have children. They have seen things no child should ever see and been forced to participate in things no child should even know about. They are in desperate need spiritually, emotionally, and physically.

    The Lord's Resistance Army has all the trappings of a cult: spirit possession, weird religious practices, and brainwashing. The soldiers are told that if they smear shea oil on their bodies, they will be invincible to enemy bullets. If they die, it is because they were "unclean" or somehow disobeyed orders. Children are systematically desensitized by being forced to participate in violence, and psychologically damaged by having weird "mind games" played with them. It is dark and demonic in the most real and insidious sense.

    In a perverse double injustice, the children who escape are often ostracized by their community. Haunted by a past that none of them chose, they are unable to reintegrate, to continue their schooling, or to find work. They live under condemnation for actions that they were forced into under threat to their lives. The children born to the girls by rebel fathers face double shunning.

    As a result of all of this, children in northern Uganda live in terror for their lives. Because most kidnappings happen at night, children who live in rural areas participate in what is called the "Night Commute". Each evening they walk, sometimes for miles, from their homes into town centres, carrying only their bed mats, and sleep, packed like sardines, on the floors of hospitals, bus parks, or anywhere indoors that is perceived to be safe. Each morning they get up before dawn to perform the trek back home. Each one repeats the same mantra: "We don't want to sleep at home because it is not safe. We fear being abducted by the rebels."

    One can only imagine the disruption, both to the school life (when can they do homework?) and the emotional and mental life of these children who grow up having to commute every night because sleeping at home is not safe. Even upon those who are not abducted, the toll is taken.

    So what can we do? These three college students started an organization called Invisible Children to document the plight of these boys and girls. They could not forget, and neither should we. Their aim is to educate the American public, to create a groundswell of support, and in turn to pressurize the American government to act to end this war. A humanitarian crisis of terrible proportions is happening in Uganda, and the West is mostly ignorant or uncaring. What we need is for people to learn about this, and from knowledge to do something. As one of the adults in the documentary I watched last night cried, "Are we not human beings?" Another, a bishop, forcibly reiterated that Africans are made in the image of God and that justice is for all, regardless of colour.

    One concrete action that everybody can take will be happening on April 29th. That night, in cities all across America, a "Global Night Commute" will be held. People are asked to spend one night sleeping on the ground in their city centre, in solidarity with the children of Uganda. If it is a big enough event, the media will have to cover it. If the media cover it, the government will know that this is an issue that Americans care about. So please visit the website, www.invisiblechildren.com, find out if there's a Night Commute in a city near you, and sign up. It's only one night. It's a small price to pay to help raise awareness and stop this hideous war.

    The website also contains many other ways in which you can help, including buying the DVD of the documentary, or buying a bracelet made by a former child soldier in Uganda accompanied by a DVD of that child's story.

    I know the people who read this blog are few. But we all have spheres of influence. Read the website. Learn about the situation. Buy the DVD. Show it at your church or youth club or school. Make other people aware. Get involved. Pray about how to help. Just as faith without action is dead, knowledge without action is dead. Do something. Even if it's "just" giving money. The children of Uganda will thank you.

  • Lyle

    Nearby the house that my family lived in between the years I was four and eight, there lived a family called the Bakers*. Their backyard adjoined onto the same orchard property that ours did, so by slipping along the treeline at the edge of the orchard, my brothers and I could quite handily arrive at the back entrance to their house.

    The Bakers had a son who was considerably older than us, fourteen to my eight, with whom we often met up to play. His name was Lyle. Tall and skinny, with glasses and a mop of streaky-blond hair, he had a loud mouth and a definite antithesis to authority. His parents, both his very fat, loud mother, and his fat, bald, passive father, tried to keep him under control by screaming at him. Lyle would simply mouth off and do as he pleased. He had an older sister who was overweight and painfully shy, to whom he was unmercifully cruel; and a much quieter, better-behaved younger brother who sometimes joined our games.

    My brothers and I, at that age, were not very choosy about our friends; especially as we didn't have many in the neighbourhood. We welcomed anyone who would play with us, no matter how unsavoury their character.

    So we'd play baseball in Lyle's backyard; or legoes in his house (jeopardized by his family's constant fighting); or roam the orchard; or swing at our house. All was very fine and innocent until Lyle's friendship took an unexpected and unpleasant turn.

    Lyle announced to us very suddenly one day that I was to be his girlfriend. What this meant was that I was now expected to hold his hand as we walked through the orchard.

    I, having little choice in the matter, found holding his hand repulsive and would take the first opportunity to drop it, seemingly artlessly, as we walked along. I most certainly did not want to be Lyle's girlfriend but as long as his designs on me were so innocent I compromised, as children do, to continue the friendship.

    However, Lyle's desires soon intensified. At the back of our house, conveniently out of sight of the windows, was an old carriage shed which was seldom if ever used. He began pressuring me to accompany him into the shed for extended periods of hugging and kissing. After all, I was his "girlfriend"; and it was his "right".

    I did not want any part of this and I refused. But I hadn't counted on Lyle's personality. He would not take "no" for an answer and began using physical force to bend me to his will.

    Thus began one of the most frightening periods of my life. To this day I cannot recall exactly how long it lasted. It might have been a couple of weeks; almost certainly it was no longer than a month. To a child time stretches forever so I am sure it stands in my mind as more than it was.

    Going outside became hell. Once venturing outside the safety of my front door, I became helpless prey for a very capable predator.

    Lyle would inevitably turn up soon after my brothers and I had gone out to play, swooping down on me like a hawk on a mouse. My brothers, God bless them, would try to defend me by throwing their bicycles into his path. But they were smaller than I and I was an eight-year-old girl and Lyle was a tall, long-legged and very strong teenager. He would run me down no matter how hard I fled, grab me, and physically drag me into the shed, despite my protests.

    You might ask why my parents didn't notice something like this going on in their own backyard? I don't know the answer. Most of the time my parents were incredibly naive about our whereabouts. I think my mother was depressed for much of the time I was growing up and she was certainly never very well apprised of what was happening out of her sight.

    I'm thankful that this period of time lasted so little as it did. If not, I am certain Lyle would have advanced well beyond what he did. Once inside the shed, he would force me to hold and to kiss him for long periods of time, probably imitating what he had seen on TV and in movies. Once, he wanted me to press my bare stomach against his as we kissed. I fought like fury at this but I well recall him overpowering me, pinning me down, unzipping my jacket, pulling up my shirt, and forcing me to do as he asked. I don't like to think what would have happened had he been allowed more time. Thankfully he wasn't.

    One day I could stand no more of the terror and I told my mother. "Lyle makes me go into the shed with him and hug and kiss him," I complained. She asked few questions but the next time Lyle came over she confronted him. I well remember standing on our front porch between her in the doorway and him standing on the steps as she reiterated my charges. Loudly and vociferously he denied it all: absolutely untrue and unfair, gesturing in angry protest at such a travesty of justice: him, charged with what?! Something he would never think of!

    "Well, OK, just see that nothing like that ever happens," said my mother, and retreated into the house and closed the door.

    I was angry: furious and disappointed that he had lied; that she seemed to believe him rather than me; and that he had gotten off the hook. That was the end of the matter. My mother never mentioned it to me again but thankfully after that Lyle left me alone. We moved soon after that and as I recall that incident spelled the end of our friendship anyway.

    Years later I learned that Lyle had died unexpectedly in his sleep of heart failure, at the age of 20. He had grown grossly fat and was a social outcast. I bear him no ill will but I do not necessarily mourn his death; I am afraid of what he might have done allowed to live longer. He was a bad combination of a complete lack of discipline and social ill-adjustment, who even at a young age seemed not to have a conscience. I wish that I could have extended him forgiveness, but I never had the chance.

    *names changed

  • Wallace and Gromit: The Curse of the Wererabbit

    Saw Wallace and Gromit's new feature-length film, The Curse of the Wererabbit, last night. Seeing it was a foregone conclusion ever since I walked into the mall and saw a fullsize colour poster advertising the movie. I've been a fan of theirs since my wonderful British friends introduced me to the shorts several years ago.

    I won't reiterate a plot overview since you can find that anywhere, just give a few thoughts:

    Overall the movie was excellent. Just as gloriously wacky, absurd, convoluted and innocent as you'd come to expect from W&G. The characters are eccentric, the plot zany, the allusions subtle and hilarious. The ending, of course, is satisfactory and W&G, good old pals, can return home in peace, another tragedy having been averted.

    The humor is brilliant. Without going into details, it is loaded with enough innuendo, visual puns, slapstick, and hilarity for six films. You will be kept laughing throughout. Some of it is subtle enough not to be caught by any but the most observant, and I think bits of it were lost on at least the audience I was watching it with (e.g. when the villain of the piece says, "The buck stops here", I don't know if anyone but myself realized it was a pun on the term for a male rabbit). However there is enough obvious humor for even children to enjoy this film.

    What were the differences, if any, between the movie and the short films? Well, I think the movie is rather self-consciously "big screen", although not detrimentally so. I think the creators stepped things up to fit into feature-film mode without selling out the charm and character we have come to love in W&G. It has a different quality to the shorts, as could be expected. You needn't have seen the shorts to enjoy the film, though it does help.

    The action is a lot faster and more elaborate. The shorts have a gentle, almost dream-like quality, even in action scenarios. W&G seem to inhabit their own quiet and slightly zany little world alone. In fact, I think the only other human character who appears in the shorts is the female owner of the wool shop in "A Close Shave". Dog and man act out their surrealistic adventures solo except for a few assorted other animal characters. Usually the only voice is Wallace's. Street scenes are always conspicuously empty.

    By contrast this film is full of the town characters, and characters they are. It's Wallace and Gromit Go Public. It adds an interesting and indispensable dimension to the movie, although I hope W&G's private world does not get lost. It seems to me to be a much-too valuable element of the shorter films.

    W&G's characters do not seem to have been altered a bit, which is a relief. Wallace is still ineffectual, naive, and cheeseloving (sort of--you'll see); and Gromit is still sharp-witted, silent and heroic. W&G fans will not be disappointed.

    The only slight beef I have with it--and slight though it is I wish the creators could have seen fit to dispense with this seemingly ubiquitous feature of modern films--was the gentle but obvious bits of sexual innuendo. No, I am not a prude. Yes, I have definitely seen far worse, even in kids' movies. However, it is just such an unnecessary intrusion into the film and it could have been done without. The W&G shorts have a rare and beautiful quality of innocence nearly unseen these days, and it was a shame for the film to lose that even slightly. It seems nobody is class enough to be able to enjoy a movie without at least a touch of the sexual, and that W&G creators were banking on this. For me, it was the only disappointment that marred an otherwise brilliant movie.